Fulfillment of the Principle of Delimitation Contradictions in Land Registration

The research findings indicate that the idea of conflicting borders is a crucial tenet in land registration to guarantee legal clarity concerning the physical data of property parcels. This approach is executed by establishing land boundaries according to agreements between neighbouring parties and in compliance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. This idea serves both technical and legal protective duties to avert disputes and overlapping rights. Consequently, data precision and the engagement of pertinent stakeholders are essential for achieving legal certainty and systematic land administration. The Banda Aceh Administrative Court Decision Number 05/G/2017/PTUN-BNA demonstrates that non-adherence to the principle of conflicting delimitation may result in procedural inaccuracies in the granting of land title certificates. The Panel of Judges asserted that measuring and boundary determination conducted without the involvement of adjacent parties contravene the stipulations of land administration legislation and the General criteria of Good Governance (AUPB), especially the criteria of precision and legal certainty. Thus, the certificate may be annulled due to administrative deficiencies. Consequently, the principle of conflicting delimitation is a crucial criterion for assessing the validity of a certificate and provides legal safeguards against land disputes.