The Position of the Sued Decision of the Notary Regional Supervisory Council by the State Administrative Court

The Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 15 of 2020 regarding the Procedures for the Examination of the Supervisory Council Against Notaries, in Article 28 paragraph (1), stipulates that the Reporter and/or the Reported Party who contests the decision of the Regional Supervisory Council is entitled to appeal to the Central Supervisory Council, submitted through the secretariat of the Regional Supervisory Council. Nevertheless, discrepancies are frequently observed in practice. An illustrative instance is the State Administrative Court Decision No. 190/G/2020/PTUN.JKT, wherein a Notary contested the Regional Supervisory Council of Notaries for the DKI Jakarta Province Decision No. 05/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov.DKIJakarta/IX/2020, dated September 14, 2020, concerning the issuance of a Written Warning Sanction to the Respondent. This study utilises the normative juridical technique, employing both the statutory and conceptual methods. This research utilises secondary data and primary data, supplemented by interviews with subject matter experts. Data is examined descriptively and qualitatively through legal interpretation. This research aims to elucidate the legal status of the Regional Supervisory Council's decisions within the framework of the State Administrative Court Law and Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 15 of 2020. The research findings indicate that the decision of the Notary Regional Supervisory Council satisfies the criteria outlined in Article 1, number 9 of the Administrative Court Law, as it encompasses the elements of being concrete, individual, and final. The panel of judges determined that the judgement of the Regional Supervisory Council of Notaries, which is the subject of the dispute, complies with all components of administrative law as per the proposal of the Regional Supervisory Council of Notaries.