Legal Consequences of Trade Agreement Default of Electrical Power by PT PLN (State Owned-Electrical Company) Acting Consument Unit of Medan

Based on Article 28 letter a and Article 29 paragraph (1) letter e of Law No. 30 Year 2009 on Registration, and in connection with SPTJBL No. PJBTL-121140561801263348, PT PLN (Persero) has breached the Electricity Purchase Agreement, specifically, the obligation to ensure uninterrupted and continuous electricity supply as agreed in the SPJBT L. In addition to the responsibility of providing compensation in the form of reduced electricity bills to the Customer, PT PLN (Persero) is obligated to comply with the prevailing regulations when unable to deliver electricity under the Level of Quality of Service (TMP). The research conducted in this study employed the Yuridis empirical research approach. This study aims to elucidate the legal ramifications of instances where PT PLN (Persero) Customer Execution Unit (UP3) Medan fails to fulfill power sales agreements. The research results indicate that PJBTL (PET PLN) will accept legal consequences for non-performance based on the perspective of PJBBL. The PJPL Party (PEPER) UP3 Medan is obligated to provide compensation to the Customer in the form of a reduction in the electricity bill, as stipulated by the current regulations.